Study: Maryland's Pay-for-Performance Programs Cut Costs, Infections

Two hospital pay-for-performance programs in Maryland have saved money and improved quality of care in hospitals, including the reduction of hospital-acquired conditions, according to a new study published in Health Affairs.

The first program studied was Maryland's statewide quality-based reimbursement program, which is similar to Medicare's value-based purchasing program. The program involves financial rewards and penalties that aim to foster improvements in process-of-care measures, such as giving aspirin to heart attack patients upon arrival or giving blood-thinning agents to patients after certain surgeries. Because of this program, all clinical process-of-care measures improved by 7.31 percent from 2007 to 2010, compared to the national average of 6.86 percent the study showed.

The study also examined Maryland's second pay-for-performance program, Maryland Hospital-Acquired Conditions Program, which was rolled out in 2009. The program compared hospitals' risk-adjusted relative performance on many hospital-acquired conditions. As a result of this program, hospital-acquired conditions declined 15.26 percent in two years, which saved Maryland $110.9 million. If this program was implemented nationally, the Medicare fee-for-service program could have saved $1.3 billion.

Results from both programs show that consistent and clear financial incentives can promote care quality and improve efficiency of care in hospitals, according to the study.

More Articles on Pay-for-Performance:

Blue Cross Blue Shield, Essentia Health Sign Cost Control Agreement
Keystone Mercy Health Plan, Cardiology Group Sign Pay-for-Performance Agreement
Bridging the Gap: 5 Resources on the Transition to Value-Based Care

Copyright © 2024 Becker's Healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy. Linking and Reprinting Policy.

 

Featured Whitepapers

Featured Webinars