UCSF Study Suggests Readmission Reporting is Flawed

Results from a new study conducted by neurological and orthopedic surgeons at the University of California, San Francisco Medical Center suggests there may be problems with how hospital readmissions rates are reported.

For their study, the researchers relied on data in the UHC Clinical Database, which collects data from 220 academic medical centers and affiliate organizations. They analyzed "all cause" readmissions, the basis for the publically reported Centers for Medicare and Medicaid metric. The researchers found all cause readmission rates overestimate unplanned readmissions by up to 25 percent because "all cause" readmissions do not distinguish between planned, scheduled, staged surgeries and unplanned surgeries for complications.

 



In short, the researchers concluded use of the "all cause" readmission metric does not account for the complexity of spine surgery, which is often spread over multiple stages and several weeks to increase safety and effectiveness.

"Publicly reported 'all cause' readmission rates may not be realistic," said senior author Praveen Mummaneni, MD. "To be accurate, substantial drill down of readmission rates is needed to find clinically relevant causes."

Related Articles on Readmissions:

40 Adventist Health System Hospitals Join Premier's Hospital Engagement Network

Social Factors May Contribute to Risk of Hospital Readmissions

N.J. Hospital Association Launches Consumer Website for Heart Failure Patients

Copyright © 2024 Becker's Healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy. Linking and Reprinting Policy.

 

Articles We Think You'll Like

 

Featured Whitepapers

Featured Webinars