The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review a discrimination and retaliation case against
Mr. Barnett formerly worked at
A federal district court ruled against Mr. Barnett, and the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals agreed by holding Mr. Barnett's claims were based on speculation and he failed to show he had suffered discrimination or an adverse employment action for reporting the alleged discrimination, which is required for a retaliation case. The appeals court stated in its opinion, "The written reprimands and negative performance review had no effect on Mr. Barnett's employment."
Mr. Barnett filed a writ of certiorari, asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear his case because he claimed the written warnings and negative performance reviews did constitute an adverse employment action. On May 19, the Supreme Court declined to review the case.
More Articles on Healthcare Lawsuits:
$89M Judgment Entered Against Florida Oncologist in False Claims Act Case
Former WellCare CEO Gets 3 Years in Prison For Healthcare Fraud
3 Largest Whistle-Blower Payments in False Claims Act Cases in 2014