The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review a case involving the Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act — an issue that has been central to recent False Claims Act litigation.
The WSLA was enacted to lengthen the time allowed to prosecute fraud offenses against the
In the Fourth Circuit case of Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., et al. v. United States ex rel. Carter — a False Claims Act case — the court applied the WSLA. The court held the False Claims Act statute of limitations had been suspended since the beginning of the war in
Two other district courts have similarly held the False Claims Act statute of limitations was suspended as a result of the war in
None of the cases suspending the statute of limitations have involved hospitals or healthcare providers. However, the suspension could still be applied to False Claims Act cases in the healthcare industry since the decisions in the cases were not industry specific.
If the Supreme Court applies the WSLA to False Claims Act cases, the ruling could present tremendous risk to hospitals and other healthcare providers. The False Claims Act statute of limitations is six years, meaning a case alleging violations of the Act could not be pursued if the alleged illegal conduct occurred before July 2008. However, if the WSLA is applied, cases could be brought for conduct that occurred as early as 2001, when the armed conflict in
More Articles on Healthcare Industry Lawsuits:
5 Tenet, HMA Hospitals Face False Claims, Anti-Kickback Allegations
Medtronic to Pay $2.8M to Settle False Claims Act Allegations
5 Recent Employee Whistle-Blower Cases