Modal e-prescribing alerts were more than three times more effective in preventing prescribing errors than non-modal alerts, according to a study published in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.
Researchers presented physicians with a modal alert, non-modal alert or no alert for 30 prescribing tasks in an e-prescribing system. Results showed that participants who had modal alerts were 11.6 times less likely to make a prescribing error than those not shown an alert. Physicians in the non-modal group were 3.2 times less likely to make a prescribing error compared to those without an alert.
The authors concluded that while both types of e-prescribing alerts reduced prescribing error rates, modal alerts were more effective.
Read the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association abstract on e-prescribing alerts.
HIT Standards Committee Attempts to Identify E-Prescribing Standards
Nearly 12 Percent of E-Prescriptions Contain Error, Study Shows
Researchers presented physicians with a modal alert, non-modal alert or no alert for 30 prescribing tasks in an e-prescribing system. Results showed that participants who had modal alerts were 11.6 times less likely to make a prescribing error than those not shown an alert. Physicians in the non-modal group were 3.2 times less likely to make a prescribing error compared to those without an alert.
The authors concluded that while both types of e-prescribing alerts reduced prescribing error rates, modal alerts were more effective.
Read the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association abstract on e-prescribing alerts.
Related Articles on e-Prescribing:
AMA, 91 Other Medical Groups Express Concern Over CMS' eRx Incentive and Penalty ProgramsHIT Standards Committee Attempts to Identify E-Prescribing Standards
Nearly 12 Percent of E-Prescriptions Contain Error, Study Shows