By Holly Carnell, 
JD, Associate and Meggan Bushee, JD, Associate at McGuireWoods.
Significant changes have been made to the privacy and security obligations of providers with respect to patients’ protected health information with the release of the Omnibus Final Rule on January 17, 2013. With the Omnibus Rule, the Department of Health and Human Services made important changes to the privacy and security requirements under HIPAA and the HITECH Act, including creating a new breach standard, clarifying the definition of a business associate, and implementing the increased liability and penalty structure mandated by the HITECH Act. Except with respect to certain grandfathered business associate agreements, covered entities and business associates are required to come into full compliance with the Omnibus Rule by September 23, 2013. With this compliance deadline quickly approaching, providers need to take the steps discussed below to ensure that they will be in full compliance by the deadline.
Updating in
ternal policies.
In order to comply with the Omnibus Rule, providers must update their internal privacy policies to reflect the changes to the HIPAA Privacy Rule, Security Rule and Breach Notification Rule. Below are certain key changes that a provider will likely need to make to its internal privacy policies.
- Breach standard. The Omnibus Rule changed the standard for determining whether a breach of unsecured PHI has occurred, and thus, when a provider must follow the notification requirements under HIPAA. Who must be notified however, has remained unchanged. The new breach standard should be included in providers’ internal policies on responding to a potential breach. Once the new standard has been incorporated into a provider’s policies, the provider should no longer use the prior breach standard, even for potential breaches that occur prior to the Omnibus Rule’s compliance deadline of September 23, 2013.
- Marketing and sale of PHI. Under the Omnibus Rule, the marketing of third party products and services and sale of PHI is generally prohibited. These general prohibitions do not apply if the provider has received valid authorization from the patient. Therefore, in order for a provider to market third party services to patients based on their PHI, or to sell or provide access to PHI for payment, the provider must request permission to do so from each patient who's PHI it wishes to use. Providers should also ensure that any definitions of “marketing” and “sale of PHI” in their policies comports with the revised definitions and standards under the Omnibus Rule.
- Decedents’ PHI. Under the Omnibus Rule, the definition of “protected health information” now expressly excludes the health information of a person who has been deceased for more than 50 years. In addition, the Omnibus Rule provides that providers may disclose the PHI of a deceased person to such person’s family members, relatives, or close friends, or other individuals indicated by the deceased, who were involved either in the deceased’s care or the payment of care. Providers may disclose only PHI that is relevant to the family member, relative or friend’s involvement in the deceased’s care. PHI cannot be disclosed if the provider is aware that the deceased person expressed a prior preference for it not to be disclosed to the person in question.
- Disclosures to schools. A provider’s policies on when PHI can be disclosed should also reflect the new permitted disclosure of proof of immunizations to schools. Under the Omnibus Rule, providers may disclose proof of immunization to schools if the school is required by state, or other, law to have proof of immunization prior to admitting the individual, and the provider obtains and documents the oral agreement to the disclosure by either a parent, guardian, or other person acting in loco parentis of the individual, or from the individual if he or she is an adult or emancipated minor.
- Patient rights to limit disclosures.
Under the Omnibus Rule, a provider must comply with a patient’s request that PHI regarding a specific healthcare item or service not be disclosed to a health plan for purposes of payment or healthcare operations if the patient paid out-of-pocket, in full, for that item or service. - Provision of electronic copies of medical records.
Providers complying with a patient’s request for an electronic copy of his or her PHI are required to provide access to such records in the electronic format requested by the patient if the records are maintained by the provider in an electronic designated record set and are readily producible in the requested format. There has been no change to the rules regarding whether a provider is required to grant access to a patient’s medical records.
Providers should assess whether it makes sense to take the opportunity to replace their policies or update existing policies. HHS has posted on its website the audit protocol derived from the recently completed audit pilot program. The audit protocol provides a helpful list of the items that an auditor will review when assessing whether a covered entity is in compliance with HIPAA. We recommend using the audit protocol provided by HHS to assess whether existing policies generally pass muster. If existing policies generally meet the requirements in the audit protocol, it likely makes sense to update existing forms. If however, existing policies are generally lacking, it may be more cost effective to replace existing policies with new, Omnibus Rule-compliant, policies.
After the policies are finalized, the provider should formally adopt and approve the policies pursuant to any procedural requirements in the provider’s governing documents or standard operating procedures.
Staff training.
It is important that a provider’s policies are both updated and implemented. Once a provider has updated its privacy policies, workforce members should receive training on any new and revised policies. In particular, management and higher-level employees should be fully trained on the new breach standard, so that, if necessary, they can correctly perform the required analysis.
Training is important both as a preventative measure and to ensure compliance with HIPAA and the HITECH Act. Training should be documented and maintained in the event training logs and program details are requested during an audit or investigation.
Notice of privacy practices.
The Omnibus Rule modifies and expands the content of the notice of privacy practices that a provider is required to maintain and distribute to its patients. After a provider has updated its NPP, the provider must make the NPP readily available to existing patients who request a copy on or after the effective date of the revisions; must post the revised notice on its website, if applicable; and must post the notice in a prominent location on its premises. New patients who receive services for the first time after modification of an NPP should be provided with a copy of the revised NPP. Consistent with the existing rules, providers should retain copies of previous versions of their NPPs and of any written acknowledgements by patients of receipt of NPPs.
Business associate agreements.
Providers should revise their business associate agreement form to reflect the new requirements under the Omnibus Rule. Providers must enter into new BAAs or modify existing BAAs by September 23, 2013. However, existing BAAs that were entered into on or before January 25, 2013 and have not been modified after March 26, 2013 do not have to be updated until September 23, 2014.
Once the provider has updated its form BAA, we recommend conducting an inventory of all current BAAs (including BAAs in which the provider is the covered entity and BAAs in which the provider is a business associate or subcontractor). Each of these BAAs will need to be modified by an amendment or replaced with the provider’s revised form BAA. This may also be a good opportunity to consider whether the protections and restrictions in the form agreement go far enough in protecting patients and the provider.
Providers should review all business relationships to ensure they have a BAA in place where one is required under HIPAA. Providers may have relationships that did not previously require a BAA, but do now under the Omnibus Rule’s expansion of the definition of “business associate.” One key change to the definition of business associate is the inclusion of subcontractors of business associates that deal with PHI. However, covered entities are not required to enter into BAAs with downstream subcontractors. Rather, the business associate who contracts with the subcontractor must enter into a BAA with the subcontractor.
In light of the numerous changes that have been made to HIPAA under the Omnibus Rule, it is important for providers to start working on compliance with the new requirements as soon as possible. Please contact the authors if you would like more information about compliance with the Omnibus Rule or HIPAA compliance generally.
More Articles on HIT:
Report: Telemedicine Patients More Likely to be Urban, Affluent, Educated
Report: 19% of Smartphone Users Have Health App
4 Steps for Successful EHR Implementation