Patients undergoing minimally invasive surgeries may be more prone to technology-related errors than those undergoing conventional surgery, according to a study published in Surgical Endoscopy.
For this study, researchers observed 26 conventional surgeries and 27 minimally invasive surgeries. Technology-related errors occurred more often in minimally invasive procedures than conventional procedures. The researchers also found relative risk for technology-related errors was higher with minimally invasive surgeries than conventional ones, and use of a time out protocol did not improve the occurrence of those events.
Researchers concluded the technological complexity of minimally invasive surgeries make these types of procedures more vulnerable to adverse events. In addition, the use of a time out protocol designed for conventional surgeries did not help reduce the risk of harm following minimally invasive surgeries. They suggested establishing a time out protocol designed specifically for minimally invasive procedures.
For this study, researchers observed 26 conventional surgeries and 27 minimally invasive surgeries. Technology-related errors occurred more often in minimally invasive procedures than conventional procedures. The researchers also found relative risk for technology-related errors was higher with minimally invasive surgeries than conventional ones, and use of a time out protocol did not improve the occurrence of those events.
Researchers concluded the technological complexity of minimally invasive surgeries make these types of procedures more vulnerable to adverse events. In addition, the use of a time out protocol designed for conventional surgeries did not help reduce the risk of harm following minimally invasive surgeries. They suggested establishing a time out protocol designed specifically for minimally invasive procedures.
Related Articles on Adverse Outcomes:
FDA Releases Draft Guidance for Drug Safety Plans
AHRQ Releases Medications at Transitions and Clinical Handoffs Toolkit
5 Ways to Foster a Top-Down, Bottom-Up Culture of Patient Safety