Stanford Law Op-Ed: Axing ACA Would Cue an 'Absolute Disaster'

A law professor and physician both argue that an overturn of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in its entirety would be an "absolute disaster," according to their op-ed in the Stanford Law Review.

Eric Segall, JD, professor of law at Georgia State University, and Aaron E. Carroll, MD, associate professor of pediatrics at the Indiana University School of Medicine, argue that a Supreme Court overhaul of the entire PPACA would affect hospitals, physicians and private companies alike.

"They've been creating accountable care organizations, envisioning a significant reduction in uncompensated care and enjoying increased Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements in primary care settings," the authors write. "That will all vanish if the ACA is struck down."

Even if the Supreme Court invalidates only the individual mandate of the PPACA, the healthcare industry will be in jeopardy, the authors say. They argue a Court decision to strike down just the individual mandate — the requirement that all adult Americans have health insurance — would cause "significant uncertainty for the healthcare markets, possibly precipitating another grave economic crisis."

More Articles on PPACA:

Health Insurance Exchanges in Jeopardy if the Supreme Court Strikes Down PPACA
House Republicans Plan Vote to Repeal PPACA Ahead of Supreme Court Ruling
Majority of Individual Health Plans Fall Below Minimum Requirement of PPACA

Copyright © 2024 Becker's Healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy. Linking and Reprinting Policy.

 

Articles We Think You'll Like

 

Featured Whitepapers

Featured Webinars