Surgical site infection rates may be higher than numbers reported by hospitals across the country would indicate, according to research conducted at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center.
In two separate studies, researchers utilized Medicare billing data from hospitals and physician offices to search for billing codes that suggested the patient may have had a surgical infection. If a bill suggested an infection, the researchers next reviewed medical records to determine if the patients indeed had an infection.
In one of the studies, they found 1.8-4.7 times as many infections through this process than traditional hospital surveillance.
Researchers suggested the different ways hospitals conduct surveillance for surgical infections, including post-discharge surveillance, may contribute to the miscalculations. Some hospitals, for instance, contact patients directly while others collect information from surgeons after discharge. Researchers added that it's not uncommon for a patient to have surgery at one hospital, develop an infection after being discharged and then have the infection treated at another healthcare facility.
Authors of the study suggest their method of identifying infections may help providers determine a truer volume of surgical site infections acquired at their respective facilities.
In two separate studies, researchers utilized Medicare billing data from hospitals and physician offices to search for billing codes that suggested the patient may have had a surgical infection. If a bill suggested an infection, the researchers next reviewed medical records to determine if the patients indeed had an infection.
In one of the studies, they found 1.8-4.7 times as many infections through this process than traditional hospital surveillance.
Researchers suggested the different ways hospitals conduct surveillance for surgical infections, including post-discharge surveillance, may contribute to the miscalculations. Some hospitals, for instance, contact patients directly while others collect information from surgeons after discharge. Researchers added that it's not uncommon for a patient to have surgery at one hospital, develop an infection after being discharged and then have the infection treated at another healthcare facility.
Authors of the study suggest their method of identifying infections may help providers determine a truer volume of surgical site infections acquired at their respective facilities.
Related Articles on Surgical Site Infections:
South Carolina Lists Infection Rates by Hospital Size
Superficial Surgical Site Infection a Reliable Measure of Quality
Colorado Releases Hospital Infection Rate Report