Retrospective audit issues: Why hospitals need better validation systems at time-of-care

Hospitals may be leaving money on the table when it comes to diagnostic related group reimbursement.

 

Typically, hospitals utilize validation services retrospectively to evaluate inpatient cases after claims have been submitted and payment decisions determined. Incorrect DRG coding assignments realized after time-of-care prevent proper reimbursement for services rendered, most often resulting in underpayments. 

 

Resonant Physician Advisory services, a Tacoma, Wash.-based physician advisory firm, and Sandra Routhier, RAC reporter, suggest five areas to examine within hospital admissions for DRG improvement opportunities:

 

1. Physician documentation accuracy and completeness

 

2. Coding education and guidelines (i.e. adherence to coding guidelines, knowledge of disease processes or surgical techniques)

 

3. EMRs (i.e. identifying revisions needed to templates, canned text, problem lists)

 

4. Medical system workflows (system issues related to the flow of data from registration to coding/abstracting to billing systems)

 

5. Lead physician and care team collaboration in documentation improvement

More articles on revenue cycle: 

DeVry offers ICD-10 course for current students, 2015 graduates
Florida county uses stopgap solutions to solve uncompensated care deficit
drchrono releases market's first medical billing app for iPad

Copyright © 2024 Becker's Healthcare. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy. Linking and Reprinting Policy.

 

Articles We Think You'll Like

 

Featured Whitepapers

Featured Webinars